The Most Common Myths About Sourcing Diverse Candidates
Published on January 4th, 2023
As companies become more aware of the importance of diversity and inclusion in the workplace, the practice of sourcing diverse talent has gained traction. However, there are still many myths and misconceptions surrounding this practice. In this article, we will debunk some of the most common myths about sourcing diverse candidates.
Companies benefit from hiring diverse candidates for various reasons. Here are a few key advantages:
**Increased innovation:** Diverse teams tend to be more innovative, as they bring a range of perspectives and approaches to problem-solving. This can lead to increased creativity and new ideas, which can give a company a competitive advantage.
**Improved decision-making:** Diversity in the workplace can also lead to improved decision-making. When a team is diverse, it is more likely to consider a wider range of perspectives and options, resulting in more informed and well-rounded decisions.
**Better representation of the customer base:** By having a diverse workforce, a company can better represent and understand the needs of its diverse customer base. This can lead to increased customer satisfaction and loyalty.
**Increased profitability:** Research has shown that diverse teams tend to be more successful and lead to increased profitability for the company.
**Legal and ethical considerations:** In addition to the business benefits of diversity, there are also legal and ethical considerations. Federal and state laws in the United States, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Employment Opportunity Act, prohibit discrimination against job candidates on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, and other protected characteristics. Hiring diverse candidates helps ensure compliance with these laws and promotes fairness and equality in the workplace.
## Debunking Common Myths About Sourcing Diverse Candidates ##
**Myth #1: Sourcing diverse candidates is expensive.**
One common misconception is that sourcing diverse candidates is more expensive than sourcing non-diverse candidates. This myth may stem from the idea that organizations must go above and beyond to attract diverse candidates, such as by offering higher salaries or additional perks.
However, research has shown that diverse teams tend to be more innovative and more successful, leading to increased profitability for the company. In the long run, investing in diversity can actually save a company money.
Additionally, many organizations already have diverse candidates within their networks, and these candidates may not necessarily require higher compensation. By simply broadening the pool of candidates that a company considers, they may be able to find diverse candidates who are a good fit at the same cost as non-diverse candidates.
**Myth #2: There aren't enough diverse candidates available. **
Another myth is that there simply aren't enough diverse candidates available to fill open positions. This may be due to the belief that there is a limited pool of diverse candidates in certain fields or industries.
However, this is not necessarily the case. While it is true that certain fields may have fewer diverse candidates, this does not mean that they do not exist. By expanding their search and using different sourcing methods, companies can find diverse candidates for their open positions.
For example, companies can tap into diverse professional organizations, attend job fairs specifically for diverse candidates, and use targeted online job boards to reach a wider pool of diverse candidates.
**Myth #3: Diverse candidates are not as qualified as non-diverse candidates. **
One of the most damaging myths about sourcing diverse candidates is the belief that they are not as qualified as non-diverse candidates. This myth is not only untrue, but it is also harmful as it perpetuates the idea that diverse candidates are inferior.
In reality, diverse candidates bring a wide range of skills, experiences, and perspectives to the table, which can be invaluable to an organization. By focusing on a candidate's qualifications and fit for the role, rather than their diversity status, companies can find highly qualified diverse candidates for their open positions.
**Myth #4: Sourcing diverse candidates is reverse discrimination. **
Some may argue that sourcing diverse candidates is a form of reverse discrimination against non-diverse candidates. However, this is not the case.
Sourcing diverse candidates are about ensuring that a company's workforce reflects the diversity of its customer base and the community in which they operate. It is not about discriminating against non-diverse candidates or giving preference to diverse candidates.
In fact, federal and state laws in the United States, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Employment Opportunity Act, prohibit discrimination against job candidates on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, and other protected characteristics.
**Myth #5: Sourcing diverse candidates is a one-time effort. **
Some may view sourcing diverse candidates as a one-time effort, rather than an ongoing process. However, diversity and inclusion should be an integral part of a company's culture and values.
To truly create a diverse and inclusive workplace, companies must make a continuous effort to source diverse candidates and create an environment where all employees feel valued and included.
**Myth #6: Sourcing diverse candidates is only important for certain industries. **
Another myth is that sourcing diverse candidates is only important for certain industries, such as those that serve diverse populations or are themselves diverse. While it is true that these industries may have a particular need for diversity, the importance of diversity and inclusion extends to all industries.
Having a diverse workforce can bring a range of benefits to any company, including increased innovation, improved decision-making, and better representation of the customer base. By ignoring the importance of diversity in their hiring practices, companies in any industry risk missing out on these benefits.
**Myth #7: Sourcing diverse candidates is a burden on HR. **
Some may view the process of sourcing diverse candidates as a burden on the HR department, requiring additional time and resources. However, this does not have to be the case.
By integrating diversity and inclusion into their overall recruitment strategy, companies can streamline their efforts to source diverse candidates. This can include using targeted job boards, attending job fairs for diverse candidates, and partnering with diverse professional organizations.
By taking a proactive approach to sourcing diverse candidates, companies can not only improve their diversity and inclusion efforts but also save time and resources in the long run.
**Myth #8: Diverse candidates are not interested in working for our company. **
Some companies may believe that diverse candidates are not interested in working for their organization, leading them to overlook diverse candidates in their recruitment efforts.
However, this is not necessarily the case. Diverse candidates are looking for the same things as non-diverse candidates: a fulfilling job with good pay and benefits, opportunities for career advancement, and a positive work culture.
By actively promoting their commitment to diversity and inclusion and highlighting the benefits of working for their company, companies can attract diverse candidates.
**Myth #9: Sourcing diverse candidates requires special treatment. **
Some may believe that sourcing diverse candidates require special treatment, such as offering higher salaries or additional perks. While it is important for companies to be flexible and consider the specific needs of diverse candidates, this does not necessarily mean offering special treatment.
The key is to create an inclusive environment where all candidates feel valued and are given equal opportunities. This includes providing equal pay and benefits, as well as offering opportunities for career advancement and professional development.
**Myth #10: Sourcing diverse candidates is a quota system. **
Finally, some may see the practice of sourcing diverse candidates as a quota system, in which companies are required to hire a certain number of diverse candidates.
However, this is not the case. Sourcing diverse candidates is about creating a workforce that reflects the diversity of the community in which a company operates and its customer base. It is not about filling a certain number of positions with diverse candidates.
By focusing on creating a diverse and inclusive workplace, companies can attract and retain top talent from a wide range of backgrounds.
**Myth #11: Diverse candidates are not loyal to the company. **
Some may believe that diverse candidates are not as loyal to the company as non-diverse candidates, leading them to overlook diverse candidates in their recruitment efforts.
However, this myth is not based in fact. Loyalty is not determined by a person's diversity status, but rather by their individual values and work ethic. By creating a positive and inclusive work environment, companies can foster loyalty among all employees, regardless of their diversity status.
**Myth #12: Sourcing diverse candidates requires lower standards. **
Another myth is that companies must lower their standards when sourcing diverse candidates in order to create a more diverse workforce. This is not the case.
Diversity and inclusion do not mean sacrificing quality. By focusing on a candidate's qualifications and fit for the role, rather than their diversity status, companies can find highly qualified diverse candidates for their open positions.
**Myth #13: Diverse candidates are not as skilled as non-diverse candidates. **
Some may believe that diverse candidates are not as skilled as non-diverse candidates, leading them to overlook diverse candidates in their recruitment efforts.
However, this myth is not based in fact. Diverse candidates bring a range of skills, experiences, and perspectives to the table, which can be invaluable to an organization. By focusing on a candidate's skills and fit for the role, rather than their diversity status, companies can find highly skilled diverse candidates for their open positions.
**Myth #14: Sourcing diverse candidates is only necessary to meet compliance requirements. **
Some companies may view the practice of sourcing diverse candidates as a way to meet compliance requirements, rather than as a way to create a more diverse and inclusive workforce.
However, the importance of diversity and inclusion extends beyond compliance. A diverse and inclusive workforce can lead to increased innovation, improved decision-making, and better representation of the customer base, leading to increased success and profitability for the company.
**Myth #15: Sourcing diverse candidates is a temporary trend. **
Finally, some may view the practice of sourcing diverse candidates as a temporary trend, rather than as a long-term commitment to diversity and inclusion.
However, diversity and inclusion should be an integral part of a company's culture and values. By making a continuous effort to source diverse candidates and create an inclusive environment, companies can foster a diverse and inclusive workforce that drives success and innovation.
In conclusion, there are many myths surrounding the practice of sourcing diverse candidates. By debunking these myths and understanding the importance of diversity and inclusion, companies can effectively source and hire diverse candidates, leading to a more successful and innovative workforce.
What do you mean by sourcing diverse candidates?
Sourcing diverse candidates refer to the practice of actively seeking out and recruiting candidates from a diverse range of backgrounds and experiences. This can include candidates who are diverse in terms of race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, religion, ability, and other characteristics. The goal of sourcing diverse candidates is to create a diverse and inclusive workforce, which can bring a range of benefits to a company, including increased innovation, improved decision-making, and better representation of the customer base. It is important to note that sourcing diverse candidates do not mean lowering standards or giving preference to candidates based on their diversity status. Instead, it is about expanding the pool of candidates that a company considers and finding the most qualified candidates from a diverse range of backgrounds.
Why should one hire diverse candidates?
Companies benefit from hiring diverse candidates for various reasons. Here are a few key advantages:
**Increased innovation:** Diverse teams tend to be more innovative, as they bring a range of perspectives and approaches to problem-solving. This can lead to increased creativity and new ideas, which can give a company a competitive advantage.
**Improved decision-making:** Diversity in the workplace can also lead to improved decision-making. When a team is diverse, it is more likely to consider a wider range of perspectives and options, resulting in more informed and well-rounded decisions.
**Better representation of the customer base:** By having a diverse workforce, a company can better represent and understand the needs of its diverse customer base. This can lead to increased customer satisfaction and loyalty.
**Increased profitability:** Research has shown that diverse teams tend to be more successful and lead to increased profitability for the company.
**Legal and ethical considerations:** In addition to the business benefits of diversity, there are also legal and ethical considerations. Federal and state laws in the United States, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Employment Opportunity Act, prohibit discrimination against job candidates on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, and other protected characteristics. Hiring diverse candidates helps ensure compliance with these laws and promotes fairness and equality in the workplace.
## Debunking Common Myths About Sourcing Diverse Candidates ##
**Myth #1: Sourcing diverse candidates is expensive.**
One common misconception is that sourcing diverse candidates is more expensive than sourcing non-diverse candidates. This myth may stem from the idea that organizations must go above and beyond to attract diverse candidates, such as by offering higher salaries or additional perks.
However, research has shown that diverse teams tend to be more innovative and more successful, leading to increased profitability for the company. In the long run, investing in diversity can actually save a company money.
Additionally, many organizations already have diverse candidates within their networks, and these candidates may not necessarily require higher compensation. By simply broadening the pool of candidates that a company considers, they may be able to find diverse candidates who are a good fit at the same cost as non-diverse candidates.
**Myth #2: There aren't enough diverse candidates available. **
Another myth is that there simply aren't enough diverse candidates available to fill open positions. This may be due to the belief that there is a limited pool of diverse candidates in certain fields or industries.
However, this is not necessarily the case. While it is true that certain fields may have fewer diverse candidates, this does not mean that they do not exist. By expanding their search and using different sourcing methods, companies can find diverse candidates for their open positions.
For example, companies can tap into diverse professional organizations, attend job fairs specifically for diverse candidates, and use targeted online job boards to reach a wider pool of diverse candidates.
**Myth #3: Diverse candidates are not as qualified as non-diverse candidates. **
One of the most damaging myths about sourcing diverse candidates is the belief that they are not as qualified as non-diverse candidates. This myth is not only untrue, but it is also harmful as it perpetuates the idea that diverse candidates are inferior.
In reality, diverse candidates bring a wide range of skills, experiences, and perspectives to the table, which can be invaluable to an organization. By focusing on a candidate's qualifications and fit for the role, rather than their diversity status, companies can find highly qualified diverse candidates for their open positions.
**Myth #4: Sourcing diverse candidates is reverse discrimination. **
Some may argue that sourcing diverse candidates is a form of reverse discrimination against non-diverse candidates. However, this is not the case.
Sourcing diverse candidates are about ensuring that a company's workforce reflects the diversity of its customer base and the community in which they operate. It is not about discriminating against non-diverse candidates or giving preference to diverse candidates.
In fact, federal and state laws in the United States, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Employment Opportunity Act, prohibit discrimination against job candidates on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, and other protected characteristics.
**Myth #5: Sourcing diverse candidates is a one-time effort. **
Some may view sourcing diverse candidates as a one-time effort, rather than an ongoing process. However, diversity and inclusion should be an integral part of a company's culture and values.
To truly create a diverse and inclusive workplace, companies must make a continuous effort to source diverse candidates and create an environment where all employees feel valued and included.
**Myth #6: Sourcing diverse candidates is only important for certain industries. **
Another myth is that sourcing diverse candidates is only important for certain industries, such as those that serve diverse populations or are themselves diverse. While it is true that these industries may have a particular need for diversity, the importance of diversity and inclusion extends to all industries.
Having a diverse workforce can bring a range of benefits to any company, including increased innovation, improved decision-making, and better representation of the customer base. By ignoring the importance of diversity in their hiring practices, companies in any industry risk missing out on these benefits.
**Myth #7: Sourcing diverse candidates is a burden on HR. **
Some may view the process of sourcing diverse candidates as a burden on the HR department, requiring additional time and resources. However, this does not have to be the case.
By integrating diversity and inclusion into their overall recruitment strategy, companies can streamline their efforts to source diverse candidates. This can include using targeted job boards, attending job fairs for diverse candidates, and partnering with diverse professional organizations.
By taking a proactive approach to sourcing diverse candidates, companies can not only improve their diversity and inclusion efforts but also save time and resources in the long run.
**Myth #8: Diverse candidates are not interested in working for our company. **
Some companies may believe that diverse candidates are not interested in working for their organization, leading them to overlook diverse candidates in their recruitment efforts.
However, this is not necessarily the case. Diverse candidates are looking for the same things as non-diverse candidates: a fulfilling job with good pay and benefits, opportunities for career advancement, and a positive work culture.
By actively promoting their commitment to diversity and inclusion and highlighting the benefits of working for their company, companies can attract diverse candidates.
**Myth #9: Sourcing diverse candidates requires special treatment. **
Some may believe that sourcing diverse candidates require special treatment, such as offering higher salaries or additional perks. While it is important for companies to be flexible and consider the specific needs of diverse candidates, this does not necessarily mean offering special treatment.
The key is to create an inclusive environment where all candidates feel valued and are given equal opportunities. This includes providing equal pay and benefits, as well as offering opportunities for career advancement and professional development.
**Myth #10: Sourcing diverse candidates is a quota system. **
Finally, some may see the practice of sourcing diverse candidates as a quota system, in which companies are required to hire a certain number of diverse candidates.
However, this is not the case. Sourcing diverse candidates is about creating a workforce that reflects the diversity of the community in which a company operates and its customer base. It is not about filling a certain number of positions with diverse candidates.
By focusing on creating a diverse and inclusive workplace, companies can attract and retain top talent from a wide range of backgrounds.
**Myth #11: Diverse candidates are not loyal to the company. **
Some may believe that diverse candidates are not as loyal to the company as non-diverse candidates, leading them to overlook diverse candidates in their recruitment efforts.
However, this myth is not based in fact. Loyalty is not determined by a person's diversity status, but rather by their individual values and work ethic. By creating a positive and inclusive work environment, companies can foster loyalty among all employees, regardless of their diversity status.
**Myth #12: Sourcing diverse candidates requires lower standards. **
Another myth is that companies must lower their standards when sourcing diverse candidates in order to create a more diverse workforce. This is not the case.
Diversity and inclusion do not mean sacrificing quality. By focusing on a candidate's qualifications and fit for the role, rather than their diversity status, companies can find highly qualified diverse candidates for their open positions.
**Myth #13: Diverse candidates are not as skilled as non-diverse candidates. **
Some may believe that diverse candidates are not as skilled as non-diverse candidates, leading them to overlook diverse candidates in their recruitment efforts.
However, this myth is not based in fact. Diverse candidates bring a range of skills, experiences, and perspectives to the table, which can be invaluable to an organization. By focusing on a candidate's skills and fit for the role, rather than their diversity status, companies can find highly skilled diverse candidates for their open positions.
**Myth #14: Sourcing diverse candidates is only necessary to meet compliance requirements. **
Some companies may view the practice of sourcing diverse candidates as a way to meet compliance requirements, rather than as a way to create a more diverse and inclusive workforce.
However, the importance of diversity and inclusion extends beyond compliance. A diverse and inclusive workforce can lead to increased innovation, improved decision-making, and better representation of the customer base, leading to increased success and profitability for the company.
**Myth #15: Sourcing diverse candidates is a temporary trend. **
Finally, some may view the practice of sourcing diverse candidates as a temporary trend, rather than as a long-term commitment to diversity and inclusion.
However, diversity and inclusion should be an integral part of a company's culture and values. By making a continuous effort to source diverse candidates and create an inclusive environment, companies can foster a diverse and inclusive workforce that drives success and innovation.
In conclusion, there are many myths surrounding the practice of sourcing diverse candidates. By debunking these myths and understanding the importance of diversity and inclusion, companies can effectively source and hire diverse candidates, leading to a more successful and innovative workforce.
Authors
Thomas M. A.
A literature-lover by design and qualification, Thomas loves exploring different aspects of software and writing about the same.
Hire the best without stress
Ask us howContents
Never Miss The Updates
We cover all recruitment, talent analytics, L&D, DEI, pre-employment, candidate screening, and hiring tools. Join our force & subscribe now!
Like/ dislike something or want to co-author an article? Drop us a note!
Stay On Top Of Everything In HR